Our own product
Rounds — the morning stop, twice
Built and run by this studio.
Rounds is the morning stop. Tech, world, business, science, sports and culture, pulled from sources worth reading, in a page you can finish.
The design argument: finishable
Almost every news product on the web is built to be infinite. The feed does not end, because a feed that ends stops earning.
Rounds ends. That is the entire product decision, and everything else follows from it. There is a fixed set of sections — Top Stories, Tech, World, Business, Science, Sports, Culture — and when you have read them, you are done and your day starts.
A finishable page is a harder thing to build than an infinite one. Infinite scroll has no editorial burden: anything can go in, because there is always more room. A page with an ending forces a decision about every item.
Every headline leaves
Rounds writes no original reporting and does not try to keep you. Every headline links straight to its publisher.
That is a deliberate refusal of the aggregator's usual move — summarising the story well enough that the reader never clicks through, which is the mechanic quietly draining the outlets that do the actual work. An aggregator that keeps the traffic is a parasite on the thing it aggregates.
The English edition draws on Hacker News, The Verge, TechCrunch, Ars Technica, Lobsters, Product Hunt, BBC, The Guardian, NPR, DW, France 24, CNBC, MarketWatch, NASA, ScienceDaily, Phys.org, ESPN and Variety, among others. Where an item comes from a discussion site, its score and comment count travel with it, because on those sources the argument underneath is often more informative than the link.
The Spanish edition is not a translation
This is the part worth stealing.
rounds.news/es is not the English page in Spanish. It is a different edition of the same
product, and almost nothing crosses over:
| English edition | Spanish edition | |
|---|---|---|
| Sources | BBC, NPR, The Guardian, The Verge, Hacker News… | El País, El Mundo, Infobae, Clarín, La Vanguardia, Xataka, Marca… |
| Markets | S&P 500, Nasdaq, Dow | IBEX 35, IPC México, S&P 500 |
| History module | "On this day", English Wikipedia | "Un día como hoy", Spanish Wikipedia — different events entirely |
| Trending | "The world looked up" | "Lo más consultado" — a different list of people |
| Views | Cards · Compact · Wire | Tarjetas · Compacto · Teletipo |
Look at the last row. "Wire" became Teletipo — the word a Spanish-language newsroom actually uses for the wire — not "Cable" and not a literal rendering of the English. Look at the first section: "Top Stories" became Portada, the front page, which is what a Spanish reader is looking for and not what a translation engine would produce.
The history module is the clearest proof. On one day in August the English edition surfaced the Gold King Mine spill and a Christchurch demolition; the Spanish edition surfaced a Spanish Civil War naval convoy and the death of Friedrich Engels. Same module, same date, different past — because it reads Spanish Wikipedia, and what a culture remembers about a date is part of the content.
A translated page gives a Spanish reader an American morning in Spanish. That is not the same product, and readers can tell instantly.
What this demonstrates
Multi-source ingestion with per-source parsing; an editorial format built around a hard stop rather than infinite supply; and localisation as a content architecture decision rather than a string-replacement pass — the same argument we make on every bilingual build we ship.
Read Rounds ↗ · Bilingual websites → · Why the web is about to start talking →
Last updated